Approximately 62% of Black employees and 42% of Hispanic employees in the STEMM workforce say they have experienced racial discrimination in recruitment, the hiring process, or competing for promotions. There is a large body of evidence demonstrating that racism, particularly anti-Black racism, is prevalent within the scientific enterprise. While the scientific method is impartial, the scientific enterprise is subject to individual biases and societal values. The scientific enterprise describes how experiments are conceived, performed, and interpreted in real practice. The scientific method is an objective strategy to understand natural phenomena. “There is no evidence of racism in STEMM.”įirst, it is important to distinguish between the “method” of science and the “enterprise” of science. Our broad goal in articulating this information is to facilitate more productive conversations (and, in turn, tangible systemic changes) toward addressing racial discrimination within STEMM.ġ.
By compiling published academic literature, we hope to directly confront racist ideology in STEMM with evidence-based arguments while simultaneously amplifying the research and perspectives of scholars of color. This team of authors represents a collaboration between scientists from historically marginalized groups and their allies. It is crucial for a STEMM anti-racism movement to extend beyond national borders, reflecting the international nature of scientific research and collaboration. Notably, while this manuscript is primarily centered around a United States perspective, most of our arguments and suggested actions remain applicable to other countries as well.
Ten of these arguments are laid out in this manuscript and paired with evidence-based counterarguments. While observing and participating in recent discussions about the racism that pervades institutions, departments, and scientific discourse, we have noticed a set of standard arguments against anti-racism action within STEMM. A spotlight was placed on the discriminatory history of scientific research and medical practice, as well as the problematic modern-day policies that perpetuate the lack of racial diversity and equity in STEMM. The growing anti-racism movement sparked conversations within science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) surrounding ways to combat racial bias in our respective fields. The wrongful murders of Black individuals during 2020 (including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Aubery, and others), compounded by a long history of similar incidents, inspired protests around the world against racism and police brutality. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.įunding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
#Type o negative racist mac
PLoS Comput Biol 17(7):Įditor: Feilim Mac Gabhann, Johns Hopkins University, UNITED STATESĬopyright: © 2021 Gosztyla et al. (2021) Responses to 10 common criticisms of anti-racism action in STEMM. Citation: Gosztyla ML, Kwong L, Murray NA, Williams CE, Behnke N, Curry P, et al.
0 kommentar(er)
